CEMENT-WITHIN-CEMENT REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY; SHOULD IT BE DONE?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?
The complete removal of the cement mantle at revision arthroplasty can be extremely difficult. Some authors advise a 'cement-within-cement' revision technique in which a new layer of cement is applied to the old before insertion of the femoral component. We could find no long-term clinical data regarding the success of this procedure. In a simple biomechanical study, we examined the strength of...
متن کاملCement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty.
We reviewed 19 revision hip arthroplasties in which the new femoral component had been recemented into the old, intact cement mantle. The mean time from the first operation to revision was 64 months and the average follow-up was 59 months. There were 7 excellent, 11 good, and one fair result. No femoral component had been revised for loosening and all the stems appeared radiographically stable....
متن کاملRevision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Cement-in-Cement Technique.
The cement-in-cement technique is useful in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially to gain acetabular exposure, change a damaged or loose femoral component, or change the version, offset, or length of a fixed femoral component. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and radiographic characteristics of revision THA using the cement-in- cement te...
متن کاملIn-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty.
The in-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty involves retaining the original cement-bone interface. This has been proven to be a biomechanically stronger method than recementing after complete removal of the original cement mantle. This study reviewed a series of 54 consecutive revision hip arthroplasty procedures, using the in-cement technique, between November 1999 and November 2003....
متن کاملStrontium-containing hydroxyapatite bioactive bone cement in revision hip arthroplasty.
Clinical outcome of cemented implants to revision total hip replacement (THR) is not as satisfactory as primary THR, due to the loss of bone stock and normal trabecular pattern. This study evaluated a bioactive bone cement, strontium-containing hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA) bone cement, in a goat revision hip hemi-arthroplasty model, and compared outcomes with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
سال: 1996
ISSN: 0301-620X,2044-5377
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.78b5.0780809